Friday, December 30, 2011
The Holocaust Controversies morons are: Nick Terry, Sergey Romanov, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Andrew Mathis, Jonathan Harrison and Michael Peters.
Here what the Holocaust community has to say about them, and their "Cut and Paste Manifesto"
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Which holocaust hate bloggers is the worst? Is it Nick Terry, Sergey Romanov, Andrew Mathis or the manic depressive Muehlenkamp? in End Holocaust Controversies Forum
Friday, November 18, 2011
Thursday, November 10, 2011
They of course responded in kind by attacking the website http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/ and its founders, who have absoluely nothing to do with the discussion or forum.
However an interesting post appeared today on the CODOH revisionist forum, discussing the Holocaust Controversies Hate Bloggers: Nick Terry, Sergey Romanov, Roberto Muehlenkamp, Andrew Mathis, etc. here is a snippet (note the section in red)
Re: 'Holocaust Controversies' problems / images
by Blogbuster » Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:50 pm
Does anyone know the reason, why he behaves like this? What is the motivation of this guy? Or what is the motivation of any Anti-German Germans anyway.
What motivates exterminationists in general? Why do they have such a need to prove revisionists wrong? Why do exterminationists frequently resort to using hostility, intimidation, and vulgarities, rather than reason? And If revisionists are right, why exactly would that be a bad thing? Who badly wants the jews to die in gas chambers, the revisionist or the exterminationist?
Fair question Cloud. I think in the case of Muehlenkamp and his associates, the debate and controversy is what's important. Not historical accuracy either one way, or the other.
The interesting part of this thread is the revisionist poster "Cloud" makes a good point. "who really wanted there to be dead Jews"? Well obviously Roberto Muehlenkamp does. He loves to post images of it, he drones on endlessly (for years) about it. He denies his own family took part in the slaughter (yet this remains to be proven), and his hate blog associates are also infatuated with the topic.
Nick Terry of Exeter has written volumes on the gruesome murder of Jews. Andrew Mathis has been involved in numerous online fights and threat sessions!
The bottom line is these guys from Holocaust Controvers have an agenda that is founded on dead Jews!
They want the countless millions to have died so they can profit on it in some warped way!
I've heard that there are emails from Michael Peters (HANS) that discuss trying to make a salary off of producing Holocaust website graphics of dead Jews! Peters referred to thes depraved images as "artwork" but email complaints to the ARC people resulted in the removal of the crap Peters posted (perhaps if they accepted the ARC challenge some of this might come to light)
These guys disgust me!
P.S the drunk NexGen is just a moron who gets off on the pictures whilst drunk.
Your post is factual and despite all the bullshit claims that will undoubtedly be posted on RODOH to deny they glorify the Holocaust for some personal profit, the posts are there to be read by any inclined to type in the words: Holocaust controversies hate bloggers! The RODOH forum is chock full of Roberto "dead Jew" glorification's! They can't escape their own actions.
Monday, October 17, 2011
My vote goes to Sergey Romanov - by a country mile.
Whether that country is Russia (where he claimed to come from) or the USA (where he lives and works for KPMG) is another can of worms to open.
Talking of cans - I hear Nexgen has run out of Budweiser.
My vote goes to Nick Terry as he is by far the sneakiest most dishonest of the lot. Surely Sergey Romanov is the most criminal and vile. Roberto Muehlenkamp is easily the most buffoonish of the lot. Michael Peters is definitely the slimiest, and Mathis is just a "nothing".
Who cares about the RODOH drunk.
Friday, October 7, 2011
Monday, September 12, 2011
Is Nick Terry going to be investigated by Exeter University for false accusations and poor research? in End Holocaust Controversies Forum
A rash of discussions has broken out on the Internet regarding Nick Terry of Exeters poor scholarship, and connection to fakes, forgeries, and foolishness.
Here is one such discussion that I'm reposting from CODOH:
Re: Nick Terry utterly demolished on Walendy forgery accusat
by Blogbuster » Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:03 am
Should you wish to see examples of Nick Terry's scholarship, or lack thereof, also the antics of the other names you have mentioned, you need look no further than CODOH itself.
(here is one thread to start you off, but there are many) viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6404
The HateBlogWatch Forum by its own admission is not a debate forum about the Holocaust but that is neither here nor there. This thread is concerning Nick Terry's poor research. He's been called out by revisionists for many such mistakes in the past, as well as quite recently by believers, as evidenced in the link from the believer website http://www.deathcamps.org link I posted above.
Why speculate on matters when the actual evidence is there to behold.
by borjastick » Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:20 pm
But in academia excommunication is very serious. Surely the dean and senior faculty staff at Exeter would be interested in his lies and obfuscations via ARC/RODOH etc?? Wouldn't they like to know what this buffoon is doing, and how he lies to one and all and more importantly has engaged in criminal forgeries?
I am lucky in that I have direct access to this particular university. I will now make an approach to the dean with all the documents and evidence shown here and on other websites about this idiot and see what they do. I would guess that Terry is in the pay of USHMM and other organisations, directly and indirectly.
by Blogbuster » Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:49 am
A very good point you make.
The posting above met with instant refute by Roberto Muehlenkamp, the only remaining Holocaust Controversies hate blogger stupid enough to continue the charade of actually pretending to be on the side of truth and pragmatism. <- we all know he's a liar, and a weirdo who gets off on creating controversy (hence the name of his hate blog "Holocaust Controversies")
I for one agree with the CODOH poster, that its time academic institutions look into the matter, and take appropriate action. We will see what happens in the near future.